Initiating and leading change in nonprofit, philanthropic and government settings.

Latest Columns

To Boost the City’s Recovery, Get ‘Learning Leaders’ Back in School

March 29, 2022

For State’s Future, The Governor Must Say No Sometimes

January 26, 2022

A better deal for retirees and NYC: But the city made two mistakes with its Medicare Advantage Plus plan

October 25, 2021

Who Decides How Public Money Is Spent?

October 15, 2021

The lame duck and the hatchling: How to run the transition between Bill de Blasio and his successor

July 5, 2021

Mayoral Candidates Flunk First Budget Test

March 5, 2021

Upending East Midtown’s progress: Gov. Cuomo’s new plans are threatening the office district’s growth

February 16, 2021

A Trumpian Push to Overturn the Will of New York City Voters

December 30, 2020

‘Hanging On’ is Not a Management Strategy

December 2, 2020

Letter to the Editor: The Assembly Member’s Bad Bank Note

September 28, 2020

Mayor Must Bridge Budget Gap Without Borrowing or Mass Layoffs

August 26, 2020

Now More Than Ever, New York City Needs Leaders to Welcome Jobs

August 11, 2020

Learning the Right Health-Care Lessons from the Covid Crisis

June 18, 2020

Keep Subways Closed Overnight to Expedite System Modernization

May 26, 2020

How to Craft the Bare Bones State Budget New York Needs

March 30, 2020

Lessons from 9/11: A Needed Piece of the Coronavirus Recovery Plan

March 26, 2020

The Governor’s Dilemma: Gimmicks or Gumption

March 9, 2020

Ruling Endangers Better Planning for City’s Future

March 9, 2020

Worrisome City Budget Update Buried by Holiday and State Woes

March 9, 2020

A Well-Meaning But Misguided Housing Proposal

March 9, 2020

Counting Votes So They Really Count

March 9, 2020

Attorney General Disrupts Progress on Taxi Loan Crisis

February 28, 2020

The Mayor’s Savings Mirage

February 4, 2020

Racing to the Scene of the Wrong Emergency

September 30, 2019

The Mayor’s Missing Pen

September 12, 2019

The Small Business ‘Crisis’ That Isn’t

August 22, 2019

A Chore We Must Do: Over-Hauling Private Waste Management in New York City

August 1, 2019

A French Lesson in Fare Evasion

July 16, 2019

Governor Gets What He Wants at the MTA; Now It’s Time to Deliver

June 25, 2019

The Fading Promise of Property Tax Reform

June 12, 2019

Taxi Medallion Exposé Drives Home Key Budget Lesson

May 29, 2019

‘Blow Up the MTA’? Not Yet

May 17, 2019

A Lion of City Government Issues a Warning

May 1, 2019

City Council Fire Department Proposals Don’t Match Need for Reform

April 17, 2019

Doing Good Things Badly: Congestion Pricing and MTA Reforms

April 3, 2019

Charter Revision Commission Needs a Hippocratic Oath

March 18, 2019

Ending The School Aid Charade

March 4, 2019

Latest Columns



For State’s Future, The Governor Must Say No Sometimes

By Carol Kellermann | January 26, 2022
Gov. Hochul presents her budget (photo: Mike Groll/Office of Governor Kathy Hochul)

Now that Governor Hochul’s State of the State address and budget presentation have been delivered, the drumbeat of advocates, interest groups, legislators and other officials seeking increased spending will grow louder. With the primary election in only six months the temptation is strong to give everyone at least some of what they want. But, flush as the state’s coffers are right now, New York cannot afford to do it all and difficult decisions that make some important groups unhappy must be made.

The State financial plan update included in the Executive Budget shows that over the five-year period of fiscal years 2022-2027, State Operating Funds disbursements will increase by almost $26 billion, an average of 4.1% annually, higher than the growth rates prior to the pandemic. Once the substantial one-time federal funds that supplement state-generated revenue are exhausted, the State will have to fund all the programs already included in the budget on its own. 

While Budget Director Robert Mujica asserts that this can be done with no deficits all the way through fiscal year 2027, he concedes that the optimistic projections for state revenue growth could change because of the continued impact of the pandemic or for other unforeseen reasons. And the generous spending included in the governor’s budget depends on the ‘temporary’ multi-year tax increases on high-earning residents and corporations adopted last year that, notwithstanding Mujica’s recent assurance to the contrary, could be incentivizing wealthy businesses and individuals to leave the state. 

It is noteworthy and wise that Governor Hochul proposes to set aside $5 billion in each of the next two fiscal years in reserves in case of a ‘rainy day.’ But it is difficult to believe that the Legislature will go along or that the Governor will be able to resist contentions from legislators, advocates, and others that the money is needed for a variety of worthy causes, even though she has already set aside $2 billion for covid-related needs to be allocated in consultation with the Legislature.

Some actions the governor has already taken are cause for concern. She announced that the state will fully implement the exorbitant and poorly-targeted increases in school aid required by the lawsuit filed by the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, giving all school districts increases even though over $2 billion a year is already provided to districts that have enough to fund a sound basic education for all their students. And she recently signed 16 bills passed by the Legislature that ‘sweeten’ pension benefits for public employees, the type of bills that were routinely vetoed by Governor Cuomo because of their long-term costs. 

An example of the kind of well-intentioned but costly and unwise initiatives that should be avoided is the “New Deal for CUNY” campaign to make all the community and senior colleges in the CUNY system tuition free for all New York residents. A bill to implement this policy was introduced in both the Senate and Assembly and has the support of a number of members as well as student groups and the union representing CUNY faculty. 

The amount of state support to CUNY (about $1.7 billion before the new additions) is two times the operating spending of the State Police and four times more than operating spending on parks and the environment. The governor’s budget adds approximately $350 million in additional operating subsidies to SUNY and CUNY as well as funding tuition assistance grants for part-time students.

Most resident CUNY students pay no tuition because of their eligibility for city, state, and federal grants. Tuition only covers about one quarter of CUNY’s costs; to eliminate this source of revenue would make the 23 campuses even more dependent on the state of New York’s economy and political calculations than is already the case. That is why legislation was enacted in 2020 to allow for regular, small increases in tuition. It should not be undone.

I am an ardent believer in the power of CUNY — I helped to launch CUNY ASAP, the most successful community college completion program in the country — and fear that eliminating its relatively small tuition payments will make its financial status more precarious. 

Nor should the similar, smart practice of regular, small fare and toll increases to help the MTA keep up with inflation be discontinued. Adopted in 2009, the policy ameliorated the prior pattern of periodic significant fare and toll increases that were fiscally and politically wrenching. The 2020 increase was postponed due to the pandemic and, thanks to a $6 billion aid infusion from federal relief funds, the governor’s budget postpones the 2022 increase as well. Several types of discounts for multiple rides have also been instituted. 

As ridership grows back towards pre-pandemic levels, the regular fare increases should be resumed. To maintain affordability for those with lower incomes, New York City should continue robust efforts to promote its Fair Fares program, which provides half-price transit service to lower-income residents. As with CUNY, our public transit system needs reasonable user fees to provide some level of fiscal stability. 

There are a number of other steps that should be taken to put the state on a firm financial footing, such as shifting economic development efforts away from the billions spent on tax incentives and business subsidies, and rightsizing and better managing capital spending.

Saying no to seemingly attractive policies that increase state spending is going to be very tough when the state seems awash in money and there is an election imminent. It may be easy and expedient to provide as many ‘free’ services as possible now, but it will be extremely difficult to undo these policies down the road when trade-offs between these and other services for the neediest New Yorkers, like the growing Medicaid program, become necessary. For everyone’s sake and the future of New York, the governor needs to hold the line on building up reserves.

This post was originally published on January 26th by Gotham Gazette.